[Explained] No correct canonical and base urls after filtering

I have checked tag page with filter by type and without filter.
It displays error

0 __clone method called on non-object

Hello

Fixed it, please re-update to v3.3.x-stable branch

ggppdk wrote: Hello

Fixed it, please re-update to v3.3.x-stable branch

Yes, now it's opens ok.
But canonical URL still displays without filtering.

Hello

implementation of this and the 2 new parameters that control it
are not yet at online repository

thinking if 1 parameter should be used and what the defaults should be

Maximum number of filters
Parameter: Used in canonical URLs
Parameter: Search engine indexable

ggppdk wrote: Hello

implementation of this and the 2 new parameters that control it
are not yet at online repository

thinking if 1 parameter should be used and what the defaults should be

Maximum number of filters
Parameter: Used in canonical URLs
Parameter: Search engine indexable

Hello!

You can add 3 parameters.

Maximum number of filters - 1,2,3
Used in canonical URLs - Yes, No
Search engine indexable - Yes, No

I know, that big sites, directories, markets expand the semantic nucleus with medium frequency queries using filtering and tags.

So, if we have category "Toys" we can get more traffic with phrazes like "Toys for boys", "Toys for girls", "Toys for kids".

To get this - we use tags and filters. So, this pages should be indexable and should have own canonical URLs.

Hello

please note that "text search text" is 1 filter
so if you have any phrase in it , it will be counted as 1 active filter


Now my question is
- if we reach a "max" level of filters then

e.g. 3

- then we stop adding rel-canonical and we also instruct engines not to index with no-index
- or we stop adding rel-canonical and allow index ? (because if we continue allowing index then it makes no sense to skip adding rel-canonical, right ?)